Moyn remarked that comparisons India Phone Number List to Hitler implied that America's cruelty and violence before Trump's rise were "somehow less worthy of alarm and opprobrium." The positions of the commentators in this debate did not correspond to a political division between center and left; on both sides were writers of India Phone Number List different political persuasions. Despite Moyn's warning that the primary function of the fascist label was to reassert centrism and stifle more progressive alternatives (by blaming its supporters for sabotaging the immediate task of defeating Trump), the reality was much more complicated. Some India Phone Number List of the most vociferous proponents of the fascist analogy.
Like Stanley, included pleas for India Phone Number List bold progressive reforms, from strengthening unions and ending mass incarceration to fighting militarism, while more centrist commentators, like Jan -Werner Müller, they rejected the epithet. If those who opposed Trump had so much in common, why such a persistent India Phone Number List argument? Proponents of the "Caesarist" analogy in the interwar decades argued that it lent clarity to the analysis. But they also insisted on its controversial value. By invoking the ghost of the Roman tyrant (at the time, a foundational reference point in the North Atlantic political imagination), they India Phone Number List hoped to foment unrest and unleash anger. Like most works of the polemical genre.
Its purpose was not to India Phone Number List open the eyes of supporters of the autocracy to their supposed madness, but to infuriate the already persuaded and deepen existing fault lines. Ironically, this was also one of the causes of the final decline of the term "Caesarism": after the mass atrocities of the 20th century, controversial India Phone Number List evocations of Stalin and Hitler had a more visceral appeal than references to Julius Caesar. Polemical writers of the last two centuries have often launched attacks against new India Phone Number List movements, ideologies, or regimes using familiar historical precedents.